cyndayco
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2014
- Messages
- 335
As usual, I went to Greenhills--as I often tell myself--to do research. My goal was to find freshwater pearls that could approximate that golden SSP color. Or as my sister-in-law likes to call it, the "Jewelmer look."
It turns out I couldn't. Everything was too yellow, too orange, too dull or too pale. So I tried to relieve my disappointment with an inexpensive multicolor FW rope and a kasumi-esque baroque strand au "oil slick".
On my way out, I gave a stall one last poke, asking to see the SSP's in the glass case. My interaction with the shopgirl was a story in itself, but the main point of this post is that I DID IT.
I was so excited; I couldn't even wait for daylight to shoot the photos.
The pearl in the foreground is 11.5mm; the pair in the back is 10.8mm. The surface is so clean; they failed the rubbing test, but they do feel gritty undertooth. I candled them with my iPhone; unlike my FW, they appear to have nuclei. I estimate the quality to be about A/B. "A/B" because there are one or two blemishes hidden from camera--a tiny ding, or a very short superficial growth line. But in the end, it was the "A" luster that got me. I don't know if you can see it in your monitors, but each is shiny enough to reflect the other two pearls.
So unless you're going to pinch me and say "Um, er, Cynthia, about those pearls..." I am going to fist-bump all of you and say "Thanks, PG, for helping me find my birthday present!"
It turns out I couldn't. Everything was too yellow, too orange, too dull or too pale. So I tried to relieve my disappointment with an inexpensive multicolor FW rope and a kasumi-esque baroque strand au "oil slick".
On my way out, I gave a stall one last poke, asking to see the SSP's in the glass case. My interaction with the shopgirl was a story in itself, but the main point of this post is that I DID IT.
I was so excited; I couldn't even wait for daylight to shoot the photos.
The pearl in the foreground is 11.5mm; the pair in the back is 10.8mm. The surface is so clean; they failed the rubbing test, but they do feel gritty undertooth. I candled them with my iPhone; unlike my FW, they appear to have nuclei. I estimate the quality to be about A/B. "A/B" because there are one or two blemishes hidden from camera--a tiny ding, or a very short superficial growth line. But in the end, it was the "A" luster that got me. I don't know if you can see it in your monitors, but each is shiny enough to reflect the other two pearls.
So unless you're going to pinch me and say "Um, er, Cynthia, about those pearls..." I am going to fist-bump all of you and say "Thanks, PG, for helping me find my birthday present!"
Last edited: