I am a jewelry designer who is in the process of updating my website. When you shop online for jewelry what is most important to you? Do you want pictures of the jewelry only, or pictures of jewelry on a model so you can see how the jewelry looks on a person? Any other suggestions? Thank you in advance for your input.
What type of pictures make you want to buy jewelry?
- Thread starter menxi
- Start date
Bacca
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2010
- Messages
- 86
I don't know how representative of buyers I am, but here's my preference. I like pictures of all angles of the piece--front, back, and sides. A closeup of any detail work is good, too. I also like to see the piece on a model, because it's easier to get an accurate idea of size. I like vintage jewelry, so I do most of my online buying on eBay, where sellers often post multiple pictures. My expectations may be a little unrealistic for an online retailer.
Lindaphillipsbong
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 257
Yeah, I agree with Bacca entirely.
Multiple shots, some good close ups, and one on a model.
Linda.
Multiple shots, some good close ups, and one on a model.
Linda.
CLICLASP
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2006
- Messages
- 1,208
I have one more question,
when you say "one photo on a model" , what's your opinion on figures like this one? Is it acceptable (not easy to have a real girl for a real necklace sometimes
Tis is what I mean (browse one second photo down )
http://www.elsa-vanier.fr/e-boutique-produit.php?collec=1
when you say "one photo on a model" , what's your opinion on figures like this one? Is it acceptable (not easy to have a real girl for a real necklace sometimes
Tis is what I mean (browse one second photo down )
http://www.elsa-vanier.fr/e-boutique-produit.php?collec=1
pattye
Pearl Scholar
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 11,456
For me, it helps if length of necklace is given in inches or mm.
Cliclasp, I thought that the 2nd photo was useful. But the actual width of the ring is not given that I could see.
For necklaces and earrings, I use a mannequin, can't afford a live model! But it does help to show the scale of a piece.
All sites I know of encourage multiple photos.
Cliclasp, I thought that the 2nd photo was useful. But the actual width of the ring is not given that I could see.
For necklaces and earrings, I use a mannequin, can't afford a live model! But it does help to show the scale of a piece.
All sites I know of encourage multiple photos.
Lindaphillipsbong
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2012
- Messages
- 257
Hello Cliclasp:
What I mean, is just some part of the body for scale.
If you don't have a model, maybe just photo the object up against your fingers or hand.
Linda.
What I mean, is just some part of the body for scale.
If you don't have a model, maybe just photo the object up against your fingers or hand.
Linda.
Isabelle35
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2011
- Messages
- 170
I might add closeups/magnified views of the 'imperfections' or special features of a piece if they are any. Also, it might sound obvious, but good quality picture with optimal lighting and appropriate backgroud to see the colors/overtones of the pearls.
Well, I agree with all the suggestions. I personally look for details about the item...so if its a pearl I want all the grading information..same with stones..I like to know what I'm buying if it's expensive.
I think the roll over magnifier is pretty handy, might only need two photos with that...and I certainly agree to make sure that any imperfections are noted or photographed.
Even when you give the accurate measurement of something..people still don't get how small 7mm is .. so I think it's essential to show it either on a model/mannequin or some frame of reference (like a coin) worked into the shot.
I don't mind the hand drawing with the ring, but as Pattye noted be sure to put in the measurements.
I think the roll over magnifier is pretty handy, might only need two photos with that...and I certainly agree to make sure that any imperfections are noted or photographed.
Even when you give the accurate measurement of something..people still don't get how small 7mm is .. so I think it's essential to show it either on a model/mannequin or some frame of reference (like a coin) worked into the shot.
I don't mind the hand drawing with the ring, but as Pattye noted be sure to put in the measurements.
Amanda
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 521
I agree that a scale is very helpful - not necessarily an actual person, though. I don't know what something will look like on me if it's modelled on someone twice my height and half my weight (-:
M & S, a very big clothes seller in the UK, says how tall the model wearing a dress / trousers / skirt etc is. That's very helpful in working out the size of something.
So someone's neck, or hand, or wrist is great. But not essential, I reckon.
For example, in this one:
http://www.marksandspencer.com/Auto..._1_46&nodeId=527058031&sr=1-46&qid=1331603751
They tell you the model is 5 ft 10 and size 12.
Back to jewellary, and I think this site does it rather well - they use attractive, but not model-type, women, and concentrate the photo on the relevant part;
I also think detail's important. So this item pictured here has 4 photos, including this one:
And is also fairly clear about what the item is:
"This smoky quartz and Swarovski crystal pendant is on a 9ct yellow gold 20inch hammered trace chain for a modern look. The stunning smooth smoky quartz pebble is 27mm long by 20mm wide and is set off by two further drops of golden brown coloured Swarovski crystals and small smoky quartz spheres. The entire pendant measures about 85-90mm from top to bottom. This fashionable pendant would look great worn over neutral coloured tops or could be teamed with a low neckline."
M & S, a very big clothes seller in the UK, says how tall the model wearing a dress / trousers / skirt etc is. That's very helpful in working out the size of something.
So someone's neck, or hand, or wrist is great. But not essential, I reckon.
For example, in this one:
http://www.marksandspencer.com/Auto..._1_46&nodeId=527058031&sr=1-46&qid=1331603751
They tell you the model is 5 ft 10 and size 12.
Back to jewellary, and I think this site does it rather well - they use attractive, but not model-type, women, and concentrate the photo on the relevant part;
I also think detail's important. So this item pictured here has 4 photos, including this one:
And is also fairly clear about what the item is:
"This smoky quartz and Swarovski crystal pendant is on a 9ct yellow gold 20inch hammered trace chain for a modern look. The stunning smooth smoky quartz pebble is 27mm long by 20mm wide and is set off by two further drops of golden brown coloured Swarovski crystals and small smoky quartz spheres. The entire pendant measures about 85-90mm from top to bottom. This fashionable pendant would look great worn over neutral coloured tops or could be teamed with a low neckline."
Amanda
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 521
I would indeed - rather more friendly than A.Jones. Only if it's no hassle, though.
Isabelle35
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2011
- Messages
- 170
Yeah welcome Amanda! Tell us more about yourself!
Amanda
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2012
- Messages
- 521
Nothing terribly exciting - I'm a born and bred Londoner, aged 33, live with Dearly Beloved and our 6 year old son, Isaac, in central London. I'm a barrister.
I like pearls, oddly enough. I prefer Tahitians and naturally non-white freshwaters to Akoyas or South Sea whites. I'm a particular fan of Tahitians, and the vivid colours of them.
Similar threads
