Please, would you check my metaphors?

IMG_1029.jpeg
IMG_1030.jpeg



I’m back! With another strand of … “well, it’s definitely a pearl.”

I think I’ve gotten good at “cfw vs akoya” but this one is stumping me.

The basics - 17” and 18”, 14k clasp, 6.5 mm. At least 12 years old (definitely not Edison)

Pearls by the neck do have some surface flaws, including dull spots and a spot that might be nacre worn away - but might just be a flat spot. (The second picture with details of the clasp)

They are round with mid level luster.

Half the time I think mid-level akoyas, and half I think better quality cfw
 
Some of the pearls appear oval to me, but that could be distortion in the photo. If they're all round, I'll go with Akoya, but the clasp attachment looks inexpensive even if the clasp itself is 14K.
 
Do you mean nacre thickness? While the nacre of white pearls is transparent, that of black pearls is not. Therefore, you would not see blinking.
Did I know this? I know about blinking but I never really thought about *why*. Transparency. I thought it was just thin and fragile.
Chalk it up to, learn something new every day ... or maybe just a new way of thinking about nacre.
 
Back
Top