Valeria101
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 2,067
'Tad scary stuff:
(Vogue Online) "Culture Club: Designers take a shine to pearls"
The presentation misses the line that may have sprouted many of its items - the boules of Dries van Noten last summer.
Not sure I can justify the editor's calling those things 'pearls'! Most of the objects clearly are not, not even possible among pearls...
What seemed interesting is the 'message' that come out of all that: that pearls need to look like something else to have a shot; better fake then common, even! Your call whether the approach is humorous or demeaning.
Does this sound realistic at all, from what you see closer to home?
Sign that there can really be too much of a good thing even for pearls?
PS. after posting this, need to claim sanity again!
No, I do not exactly LIKE those things. Just admire the striving for inspiration. At most, it seems reasonable to assume that some new, wearable forms could come up from toning those crazy extremes down a step or a dozen... hopefully still in interesting ways. Much like their makers do for a living.
(Vogue Online) "Culture Club: Designers take a shine to pearls"
The presentation misses the line that may have sprouted many of its items - the boules of Dries van Noten last summer.
Not sure I can justify the editor's calling those things 'pearls'! Most of the objects clearly are not, not even possible among pearls...
What seemed interesting is the 'message' that come out of all that: that pearls need to look like something else to have a shot; better fake then common, even! Your call whether the approach is humorous or demeaning.

Does this sound realistic at all, from what you see closer to home?
Sign that there can really be too much of a good thing even for pearls?
PS. after posting this, need to claim sanity again!
