This pearl is being sold with certificate as Melo Melo. But not convinced. What do you think?

I sent the thing back to him and it arrived in India. Currently still there as seller could not pay the fee to retrieve. They attempted his shop/home but he was not there. I am not only passionate about pearls and rare gems, I am also curious, and just had to find out what the heck that was. I also did some Utubing on the city he is from, and realized the struggle is real.

I will continue on this thread with update on conch ring and the Melo Yellow (lol) pearl. I had not realized it could all be on one thread. I also have some so called Tahitian pearls that I dread posting in case they are not lol
Doesn't take misery to be in the fraud business. Greed is sadly blind to economic condition.

Tahitians will need their own thread, it will be a very different conversation. The conch ring when finished would best be posted on that thread, as a logical follow-up.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't take misery to be in the fraud business. Greed is sadly blind to economic condition.

Tahitians will need their own thread, it will be a very different conversation. The conch ring when finished would best be posted on that thread, as a logical follow-up.
Got ya
 
I hope it’s this one. Supplies arrived today “finally”, that I will make a ring with shell tiers housing Melo Yellow. Have another idea in mind, so will attempt both, and see what happens.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5023.jpeg
    IMG_5023.jpeg
    237.9 KB · Views: 7
I hope it’s this one. Supplies arrived today “finally”, that I will make a ring with shell tiers housing Melo Yellow. Have another idea in mind, so will attempt both, and see what happens.
This is the one. Your ideas are clear, and you have extensively searched for natural porcelanous pearls that do work well with the settings you had in mind. Hopefully, as mentioned above, you are able to set the 'Yellow Melo' side with missing section of outer layer down.

I personally have nothing against epoxy for setting although it is not the norm for high-end natural pearl jewelry. I wonder whether you have considered pendant vs. ring? Your creations appear to be awfully fragile to be worn on the hand.
 
This is the one. Your ideas are clear, and you have extensively searched for natural porcelanous pearls that do work well with the settings you had in mind. Hopefully, as mentioned above, you are able to set the 'Yellow Melo' side with missing section of outer layer down.

I personally have nothing against epoxy for setting although it is not the norm for high-end natural pearl jewelry. I wonder whether you have considered pendant vs. ring? Your creations appear to be awfully fragile to be worn on the hand.
Hi there. Yes, you are correct. I did consider pendant because of this dilemma. I just posted on the conch thread. I used B6000 for glueing. She is secure but I made some changes.
 
I call her Melo Yellow
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5056.jpeg
    IMG_5056.jpeg
    2.1 MB · Views: 11
  • IMG_5062.jpeg
    IMG_5062.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 11
  • IMG_5063.jpeg
    IMG_5063.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 12
  • IMG_5065.jpeg
    IMG_5065.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 10
  • IMG_5066.jpeg
    IMG_5066.jpeg
    2.9 MB · Views: 11
  • IMG_5070.jpeg
    IMG_5070.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 10
You must be pleased, it is nicer than the seller's photos, also is less yellow with tendency to the more typical brick/light orange. While creative, the photos are taken under different lighting and background conditions that make it impossible to judge which side should be up. What is your choice? Photo 2, with strong direct lighting, does appear to have a circumferential flame pattern indicating polar view.
 
Last edited:
You must be pleased, it is nicer than the seller's photos, also is less yellow with tendency to the more typical brick/light orange. While creative, the photos are taken under different lighting and background conditions that make it impossible to judge which side should be up. What is your choice? Photo 2, with strong direct lighting, does appear to have a circumfrential flame pattern indicating polar view.
Yes it is much better looking in person. I tried with and without flash. The actual color is not as light, yellow but leaning to orange as well. I just took some pics but have not really inspected what area I will set exposed. He sent IGI,, or something like that, not home but will check it out when I get back. Not AIG, but can’t remember .
 
I'm not aware of their level of expertise with pearls vs GIA, can you post the certificate?
 
GIT website with description of services posts a sample certificate that coincidentally certifies a "Melo" pearl. The methods and terminology are consistent and professional, so no problem. The most important detail is under Treatments. "No indication of treatments" means no working, shaping, dye, etc. Regarding species, there can be no scientific determination, merely a nod to trade tendency.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4637.png
    IMG_4637.png
    631.3 KB · Views: 9
You must be pleased, it is nicer than the seller's photos, also is less yellow with tendency to the more typical brick/light orange. While creative, the photos are taken under different lighting and background conditions that make it impossible to judge which side should be up. What is your choice? Photo 2, with strong direct lighting, does appear to have a circumferential flame pattern indicating polar view.
You must be pleased, it is nicer than the seller's photos, also is less yellow with tendency to the more typical brick/light orange. While creative, the photos are taken under different lighting and background conditions that make it impossible to judge which side should be up. What is your choice? Photo 2, with strong direct lighting, does appear to have a circumferential flame pattern indicating polar view.
The fourth pic is the closest to the color of Melo Yellow. But in different lighting it shows different shades of yellow. Pretty cool pearl. Feels like the conch pearls, like I am touching porcelain.
GIT website with description of services posts a sample certificate that coincidentally certifies a "Melo" pearl. The methods and terminology are consistent and professional, so no problem. The most important detail is under Treatments. "No indication of treatments" means no working, shaping, dye, etc. Regarding species, there can be no scientific determination, merely a nod to trade tendency.
Thank you. I just sent it to you in message.
 
Your certificate follows the example of the specimen I posted above, and confirms that Melo Yellow is a natural non-nacreous pearl, untreated in any way. Likewise, it confirms that it may be referred to as a ‘Melo’ pearl. It is a very nice pearl and you have a good plan for it. And at 6.8 carats, the price you paid is more than fair.

But to be clear, it is not certified as a Melo Melo pearl, which would be species-specific. The rare examples of Melo Melo pearls with certificate are either documented at harvest or undeniably typical in appearance, including large sizes only possible in mature Indian Veloute shells.
 
Last edited:
Indeed, that Gastropod is huge with pearls forming for quite some time. Little yellow is exactly what I was looking for. I not only have fascination for the precious pearls produced, but the entire species of who produce them. All pearls and mollusks. Nature is a marvel. Thank you for all your help and teaching. I shall be back with M.Y. Ring setting.

Kind Regards,

Iliana
 
Toying with some ideas for M.Y. The ring idea did not go as expected.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5085.jpeg
    IMG_5085.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 10
  • IMG_5084.jpeg
    IMG_5084.jpeg
    2.4 MB · Views: 10
  • IMG_5086.jpeg
    IMG_5086.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 10
  • IMG_5091.jpeg
    IMG_5091.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 9
  • IMG_5093.jpeg
    IMG_5093.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 8
  • IMG_5088.jpeg
    IMG_5088.jpeg
    928.6 KB · Views: 10
Glad to see pendant vs. the shell ring, especially as the pearl seems relatively clean on all sides. The cage is too distracting, something more delicate would do more justice to the pearl. White metal would be my choice also.
 
Finished this setting.
Glad to see pendant vs. the shell ring, especially as the pearl seems relatively clean on all sides. The cage is too distracting, something more delicate would do more justice to the pearl. White metal would be my choice also.
i concur. The simulated silver coral looks a bit much. Still figuring it out. Took these pics below in natural light. The other ones were indoors. First one is the back side, which actually I like better.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5114.jpeg
    IMG_5114.jpeg
    840.5 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_5113.jpeg
    IMG_5113.jpeg
    494.8 KB · Views: 9
Glad to see pendant vs. the shell ring, especially as the pearl seems relatively clean on all sides. The cage is too distracting, something more delicate would do more justice to the pearl. White metal would be my choice also.
Actually, come to find out that what I thought was the back part is actually the front. The ring was absolutely not what I hoped for. It sat about half inch from the finger. I took the shells out and left one, but nope, still looked bad. I feel it much safer on a pendant anyhow. Still working on that later.
 
Actually, come to find out that what I thought was the back part is actually the front. The ring was absolutely not what I hoped for. It sat about half inch from the finger. I took the shells out and left one, but nope, still looked bad. I feel it much safer on a pendant anyhow. Still working on that later.
You have the advantage. We haven't seen clear enough photos to determine back vs. front vs. top vs. bottom, mostly the pearl appears to be uniformly lustrous under varied lighting conditions, with an attractive creamy-orange color. There was that one apparent missing section of the top surface layer in one photo, otherwise a setting that exposes the majority of the pearl surface should work.
 
Back
Top