[pattye]

Hi All,

Carolyn Ehret has given me permission to share this interesting and very rare piece with you all............of course, the photo is used with her permission........... Thanks very much, Carolyn..............



A rare necklace of Pen (Penn) pearls, approx 4-7.9mm, 26 inches long. Pearls were collected over a 10 year period in Gulf of Mexico. These are nacreous pearls with orient and lustre, chocolate black color. She says Pen pearls are often quite soft and break apart easily, but these being nacreous are not fragile that way. The Pen shell often is half nacreous and half non nacreous.

The pendant is a natural oyster pearl. (I think the cluster of 3 stones at the bottom are diamonds). We have so little information about these rare pearls here on the forum, much less a photo of a whole strand! I thought the oyster pearl unusual and lovely also.

Jeremy also is showing two lots of Pen pearls in the natural pearls section of his website.

Pattye
so many pearls, so little time

[Valeria101]

That's one interesting necklace It couldn't have been easy to come up with such a great design with such unusual pearls, but it certainly works... IMO.

Thanks for posting

[jshepherd]

The nacreous ones are rare. The pearl has to form in the back of the shell to be nacreous.

Penn pearls are completely the byproduct of the mollusk fishing industry. I received an email a few months ago from GIA asking if I had every heard of any culturing attempts so I did some research. It is just not viable because the pearls are typically a pretty hard sell - even the naturals.

The non-nacreous pearls will not last. The dry up and crack, and really cannot be drilled. The nacreous pearls are better and have some decent luster, but about 70% of the pearls found are non-nacreous.

[Slraep]

That's a really curious necklace.

Thanks for the info, Jeremy. Interesting about the pearl having to form in the back of the shell to be nacreous. Never heard that before. There's always a lack of info on these types of rare things.

Slraep

[Kevin Canning]

interesting necklace from the rarity standpoint, but the chocolate covered raisin look doesn't exactly do it for me personally.

[john675]

Originally Posted by Kevin Canning

the chocolate covered raisin look doesn't exactly do it for me personally.

Funny - the exact phrase came to my mind when I saw the pearls. It is a fascinating necklace, but I would think of raisinettes every time I looked at it...

Thank you for sharing the picture & story, Pattye (and Carolyn) and for the additional background information, Jeremy. I learned something new today...
John

[boo]

I have always wondered, and now I have the chance to ask: what is the name of the creature that produces Penn pearls. I tried looking up Penn shell, but while I get a some results, there are not many and none are from shell identification or taxonomic sites (or if there are, they were nowhere near the top of my search results).

[jshepherd]

The pen shell is otherwise called the Pinna rugosa or the Atrina maura. You won't find a lot of reference to either of them. But you should find reference to the Pinna nobilis in Strack.

[boo]

Thanks Jeremy!

[pattye]

Thanks Jeremy, for the additional information. I missed the connection between the Pinna shell when I checked Strack for information.

Pattye
so many pearls, so little time

[barbie biggs]

It would be really cool to devote 10 years to building something like this necklace. It would take a certain amount of vision, and a willingness to commit oneself to collecting for the sake of collecting, just to see what would come of it in the end. I think it's really cool! Raisins indeed! I like the vision that went into it! Does anybody know how much it's worth?

[DrTKStern]

Originally Posted by jshepherd

The pen shell is otherwise called the Pinna rugosa or the Atrina maura. You won't find a lot of reference to either of them. But you should find reference to the Pinna nobilis in Strack.

Thanks, Jeremy. On one of my large, irregular Atrina vexillium (per GIA) there is an area of orient not present on most of the pearl; so I guess some formation took place far back in the shell. With Caitlin's help, I posted a couple of photographs in another thread. Your comment clears up a mystery for me.

Tom Stern,MD