| Pearl-Guide.com |
| The Forum |
| About Us |
| News and Events |
| Cultured Pearls |
| Cultured Pearls |
| Saltwater Pearls |
| Freshwater Pearls |
| Akoya Pearls |
| Tahitian Pearls |
| South Sea Pearls |
| Cortez Pearls |
| Keshi Pearls |
| Mabe Pearls |
| Natural Pearls |
| Natural Pearls |
| Conch Pearls |
| Melo Melo Pearls |
| Abalone Pearls |
| Scallop Pearls |
| Pearls in History |
| History of Pearls |
| Pearl History Timeline |
| Famous Pearls |
| Kokichi Mikimoto |
| Pearls and Medicine |
| Pearls in Myth |
| Pearl Cultivation |
| Pearl Producing Mollusks |
| Pearl Farming |
| Pearl Nucleus |
| Pearl Harvest |
| Pearl Treatments |
| Pearl Care & Grading |
| The Pearl Necklace |
| Caring for Pearls |
| Grading Pearls |
| Pearl-Guide FAQ |
| Glossary of Terms |
| Forum Rules and Policies |
| Contact Us |
| |||
| They are graded much in the same way as other pearls. The most important is the luster. Freshwater pearls will a dull surface are not typically very valuable. Those with a very high luster are quite rare, and can be very valuable. The shape is also very important in freshwater pearls. If the pearls are very round they are rare. Most freshwater pearls are off-round. And these can be secured quite easily for $3-$500 per kilo. Even less if you are dealing with a large factory. Blemishing is also a big factor with freshwater pearls. Being solid nacre the inclusions are typically much more visible than in other nucleated pearls such as Akoyas. All other factors being equal the size will always determine the value. The larger the pearls, the more valuable. But you must check to see if the pearls are nucleated (as some freshwaters are as well) before putting a lot of money down for large round freshwater pearls. Michael http://www.selectraders.co.uk |
| |||
| Quote:
I know you are now aware that there is no standard pearl grading system, and the A grading system is mostly subjective so that AAA means something different to each different person using the term. You probably also know that Gia has developed a standard "description" system which is for the purpose of describing a pearl so that two people discussing pearls over the phone could use the descriptive terminology and be picturing the same quality and color pearl in their mind. The challenge for the "description" system is to overcome the need for people to see a letter grade. People are so accustomed to seeing a letter grade that without one, some would be lost. To work around that letter grade issue, we decided to develop our grading system using a combination of the GIA descriptive system, and the system of one of our factory suppliers, and then apply letter grades to each of the value factors. We specify the grade of a pearl for each of its value factors. Then we average them, giving more weight to luster first, and roundness second, to come up with an overall grade. You can see our grading system description here: http://pearlsandjade.zoovy.com/c=tsU...rgradingsystem After looking at the grading system, you can see an example of how we apply that system with a necklace here: http://www.pearlsandjade.com/product/N3004 The highest grade in our system is AAA+, except in "matching" where the highest possible grade is AAA. This strand gets our highest grade in each value factor, and the detailed photos back up the description and grades. The overall grade is AAA+ In this example http://www.pearlsandjade.com/product/P112P156 we only gave the pearl an AAA for luster. The luster is a little less than in the first example. We gave it an AAA for surface quality. We could have given it an AAA+ for surface but elected to be more conservative. It was AAA+ for shape, so the overall grade came out to an AAA. Our highest luster grade is AAA+. And we designed it that way so that when we find a fw pearl that has the akoya-like luster, we will have room to add an AAAA grade. |
| Sponsored Links |
| |