Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 121 to 130 of 130
  1. #121
    Natural Pearl Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert Amrita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tianjin & Beijing, China
    Posts
    1,242

    Default

    Were you able to see the photos side by side, Lisa?

  2. #122
    Perpetual Pearl Student Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert lisa c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,171

    Default

    Hi Amrita, nope. Top to bottom, but that's ok; they're huge and I love to see them that way. Stacking is fine once I know Who's On First( Left, Right etc).

  3. #123
    Perpetual Pearl Student Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert lisa c's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    3,171

    Default

    Hi Amrita, and Pearl Dreams, thanks for the suggestion. I made it fill the whole screen, no change. Maybe it's something about the way my stepdad has his program setup (he's even more Senior than I am, so he might've chosen this deliberately). I don't know if that's true for sure, but seems to me everything I've seen lately here has been stacked. It's still ok; I really, really really love the huge photos.

  4. #124
    Natural Pearl Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert Amrita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tianjin & Beijing, China
    Posts
    1,242

    Default

    Well, I am glad you like them, Lisa….stacked or otherwise

  5. #125
    Museum Pearl Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    6,164

    Default

    I think the photo turned out well..but also wondered how close to the actual colours is the strand on the left. The other two photos seem to be quite realistic in the colours..the one on the left looks different in colour. Beautiful I might add lol If you are concerned with detail of the pearls, do you think it would be a good idea to add a second shot with a close up that's representative of the surface quality? The are lovely pearls ! What size are they ? I don't know why but they look big !

  6. #126
    Pearl Enthusiast Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert Pearl Dreams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    8,450

    Default

    Amrita, I think the last 3 photos show enough details, yes.

  7. #127
    Natural Pearl Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert Amrita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tianjin & Beijing, China
    Posts
    1,242

    Default

    Thanks for the replies, Katbran and Pearl Dreams.
    Katbran, that was my point. The one that looks different is the photo taken in the lightbox. I sometimes feel that the lightbox mutes out the pearl features a bit although they still look lovely with lesser light reflections. The size of the pearls is 10-11 mm - so they are bigger than average. Yes, I love these pearls too - thanks!!

  8. #128
    Pearl Enthusiast Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert Pearl Dreams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    8,450

    Default

    Perhaps the answer is to provide several photos of the same pearls-- with light box and without. It's more work, but buyers would have the best possible understanding of what the pearls look like before ordering.

    However, they cannot know what the pearls will look like on their skin until they receive them, so this may have little impact on the number of returns.

  9. #129
    Natural Pearl Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert Amrita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tianjin & Beijing, China
    Posts
    1,242

    Default

    Thanks Pearl Dreams. Of course you are right. But the question that always niggles my mind is - Is the lightbox shot giving any additional information about the pearls (in addition to the other shots) or just confusing people?

  10. #130
    Pearl Enthusiast Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert Pearl Dreams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    8,450

    Default

    Yes, I see what you mean.

    Well, speaking only for myself, I prefer non-light box photos when I'm buying pearls as they give me a better idea of what I am likely to see when I wear them.
    I don't live in a light box!

    That said, I totally understand why vendors use their complex lighting systems. Artificial light often doesn't bring out the best in pearls, yet there is much too much variability in natural light at different times of day, different seasons, different weather conditions, etc. Really I understand why vendors turn to light boxes or other sophisticated camera lighting systems. Eventually buyers get a feel for what a particular look in a photo translates to in real life and under normal lighting. In the process there may be a few returns.

    I do like it when buyers post their own photos of things they bought rather than just the vendor photos. It helps all of us who are thinking of a similar purchase.

Similar Threads

  1. Jewellery News Asia's 2010 Pearl Report
    By effisk in forum Pearling Industry News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-07-2011, 04:38 PM
  2. My dabble in pearl jewellery
    By ShashiRatna in forum The Lowly Beaders' Club
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-15-2010, 11:43 PM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-22-2008, 12:09 PM
  4. Tahiti pearl : the absolute men jewellery
    By CLICLASP in forum Pearl Fashion & Style
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-04-2007, 06:49 AM
  5. Taking pictures
    By cyens in forum Show Us Your Pearls!
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-02-2006, 01:07 AM