Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: I recently found a pearl while eating lobster - any feedback greatly appreciated

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Tofino, BC Canada
    Posts
    939

    Red face

    Quote Originally Posted by Martin View Post
    Can these type of lab composition tests be performed without damaging the pearl?
    No, unfortunately. Or at least not to my knowledge. Gem labs are concerned with nacreous pearls for the most part and only certain species.

    Palaentology labs however, are better equipped to provide some insight as to the origin of pearls, but still require a level of conjecture.

    Steve brought up an important point, whether the pearl has the characteristics of a molluscan shell or that of an exoskeleton. Calcium versus keratin. There are a couple of field tests you might try, which can help us come to a better conclusion.

    Drop the pearl in a glass of water. Does it sink rapidly and touch bottom with a "tink" or does it drop slowly and touch softly? The former could indicate calcium and the latter protein.

    Also, run it across a tooth. Does it feel gritty (calcium) or smooth (protein)?

    Do you recall what part of the lobster yielded the pearl? Body, legs/claws or tail? Crustaceans tend to be aggressive scavengers and as such are not beneath fighting for survival. Punctures and cracks in the carapace or extremities often occur and tend to heal quite quickly, because they molt their entire shell several times in their lives. It is possible a parasite found a point of entry, in which case "candling" might reveal it. In the absence of a nucleus, it's possible the pearl was created spontaneously, whether by stress or genetic anomaly.

    Any pearl from an arthropod is rare, but not necessarily uncommon. Though not gem quality, they are certainly unusual and esteemable finds.
    Dave
    http://www.lagoonislandpearls.ca/

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Spain/United Kingdom
    Posts
    6

    Thumbs up Field test results

    Thank you Dave for your posting and useful insight. Preliminary results, based on the field tests you suggested, would indicate a calcium composition.

    In the first test the pearl sinks quickly with a characteristic tink. The second test is not as conclusive since the texture is not exactly gritty but not totally smooth either.

    If I recall correctly, the pearl was in the main body of the lobster.

    Martin

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-23-2011, 03:08 PM
  2. Lobster Please!
    By mausketeer in forum Natural Pearls
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-20-2011, 06:33 PM
  3. Found Quahog Pearl While Eating
    By jin512 in forum Natural Pearls
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-10-2011, 12:17 AM
  4. Replies: 168
    Last Post: 12-27-2010, 05:54 PM
  5. Advice Appreciated - Purplish Pearl With Flame
    By Only Natural Pearls in forum Natural Pearls
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-30-2010, 07:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •