
Originally Posted by
Mary Montpezat
I'm going to be a bit of a contrarian here - I've watched Paspaley's marketing campaign over the last 15 years. It has been one of the most intense PR campaigns I have ever witnessed.
Their jewellery designs aren't actually outstanding IMO.
Interestingly, they have clearly invested a LOT of money in their google rankings - any searches for Paspaley plus "overpriced" come up with zero results, which is pretty much impossible that that's a reality online. I don't know enough about pearls to know whether an objective assessment would find their prices to be appropriate - but I do know that a superlative marketing campaign will overwhelm reality every time, and demonstrates that they are quite allergic to the possibility of negative commentary. I don't think a company that's totally confident of its actually quality - as opposed to brand appeal - would need to be quite so controlling of conversations.
If someone can mount a rational case that Paspaley would be as highly regarded without a ten-year marketing blitz, please argue their case with me! I think many of their designs that contain very few pearls and lots of worked metal, seem incredibly expensive - e.g. $11,000 for a white gold bracelet with four (admittedly superb!) pearls.