[effisk]

Originally Posted by Satine De La Courcel

why let a ghost writer do it and just let it "Slip" by??

some of the mistakes are no intentional (gulf of mexico) while some others may well be intentional. I find it suprizing that no one in the committee corected the gulf of mexico mistake, which makes me wonder if the actually read the finished thing. I also find suprizing that all agreed about the definition of the keshis.

I'd like to hear what K Scarratt thinks of the book.

[pbazar]

I agree with Jeremy that the definition goes against current industry use.
I think he should forward his thoughts on to the committee. I know most of the members and they are good and reasonable people. Like most committee work it is hard work and unappreciated.

[Satine De La Courcel]

Originally Posted by effisk

some of the mistakes are no intentional (gulf of mexico) while some others may well be intentional. I find it suprizing that no one in the committee corected the gulf of mexico mistake, which makes me wonder if the actually read the finished thing. I also find suprizing that all agreed about the definition of the keshis.

I'd like to hear what K Scarratt thinks of the book.

Agreed! I too wonder if they actually read this stuff.


Cheers
Ash-who thinks she should just go back to her research and Pearl creations. I stay out of trouble (mostly) that way

[GemGeek]

The steering committee is clearly comprised of knowledgeable and appropriate people. The problem is that there is no representation for Chinese freshwater cultured pearls. Without it, the interests of Chinese freshwater growers are underrepresented. It leaves the CIBJO organization looking like they are discriminating by omission.