[Taylor]

Hi Beaders,
I have tried searching for the term gimp, but either it is too short or not in any thread, so I started one. Question: does anyone use gimp any more? Several old necklaces (pearl and otherwise) I own and have seen use gimp where the string meets the clasp, but none of the newer ones seem to.
What is the value of having it or not?
Gimp is a tiny coil like a spring that fits over the clasp loop and over which the string is wound. (Feel free to correct my definition.) I think it made the strand move more freely???
I, too, am very unhappy with how my pearls were re-strung and want to learn to do it myself by starting with beading FW pearls and beads for little gifts.

[marikita]

I've never really seen too many strands that don't use gimp. I always thought of it as an essential part of (re-)stringing. From what I understand it prevents the silk from wearing through.

Personally I don't use silk - I find it easier to use stainless steel cable and crimps... but I guess you'd call that cheating!

[pearltime]

Hi, Isn't gimp the same thing as French wire or bullion?

Karen

[Taylor]

Yes, now I see it is the same thing and when searching on french wire, I find all good necklaces should have this. Agree? But some of my old ones seem to have a cover of thread over the wire. What is this?
To cover or not?

[jshepherd]

A strand without the french wire is often indicative of either a low-quality strand, or an unprofessionally knotted strand.
Here is a great photo of it on Angela Carol's Site.

http://www.angelacarolpearls.com/Fre...ethod-s31.html

[pearltime]

Are you speaking of a crimp cover?

[Taylor]

Hi Pearltime,
No, I don't think I mean a crimp cover... I Googled that and it doesn't look like what I mean. On several of my necklaces that have french wire, the tread passes through the coiled wire, the thread covered by the gimp goes through the clasp's loop, and the exposed thread goes back into the last pearl or last 2 pearls and is then knotted. But on 2 old ones the french wire is then covered with a wrapping or winding of silk thread so the wire is hidden.
I was wondering how to do the wrapping so that the coil isn't destroyed.

[jewel457]

Originally Posted by jshepherd

A strand without the french wire is often indicative of either a low-quality strand, or an unprofessionally knotted strand.
Here is a great photo of it on Angela Carol's Site.

http://www.angelacarolpearls.com/Fre...ethod-s31.html

Hi Everyone,

That's a strong statement! Rather Strong! Please take into consideration that there are other components used on the closer section. I.E., clam shell, bead tip. I don't believe one would want to place French Wire on the thread then run said wire through a bead tip and tie. A bit bulky, perhaps.

[jshepherd]

Maybe I should preface that statement with the mention that I am referring to classic strands, not designer pieces or beading work. I would consider a strand of pearls not finished with french wire to be unprofessionally strung. I believe the clam shell you refer to is a type of crimp, which would never be suitable for a high-end strand of pearls.

[Pearls_by_Angela_Carol]

Originally Posted by jshepherd

Maybe I should preface that statement with the mention that I am referring to classic strands, not designer pieces or beading work. I would consider a strand of pearls not finished with french wire to be unprofessionally strung. I believe the clam shell you refer to is a type of crimp, which would never be suitable for a high-end strand of pearls.

Jeremy is correct. When looking at a classic strand of pearls, you will find the thread tied off in one of two methods. The cheaper way out is to just knot the thread directly to the eyelet on the clasp. This is usually indicative of a lower grade strand of pearls or worse, the manufacturer/retailer taking the cheap way out to save a few pennies in labor and material.

The second method is to use a French Wire. With the French Wire method, the silk thread at the end of the strand is threaded through about 1/4" of French Wire, then looped through the eyelet of the clasp. Next, it is threaded back through the last pearl and tied between the second and the last pearl. Alternatively you can also thread back through the third pearl also and tie off the silk thread again.

The advantages of the French Wire method are that it provides a very clean, finished look to the pearl strand and it also strengthens the end of the strand (both at the stress point of where the thread meets the clasp and providing extra strength through the second and the last pearl).

The "clamshell" or "bead tip" method is very inappropriate for a pearl strand. In this method you thread the cord though the bottom hole of the "clamshell" and tie a knot in the cord. After the knot is tied, you crimp the clamshell together and then crimp the "hook" of the bead tip through the eyelet of the clasp. The strength of this type of finish relies entirely upon the strength of the knot - as that knot is all that prevents the cord from slipping back through the hole in the clamshell. To help secure the knot, some cement can be applied to the cavity where the knot rests. This method work well with nylon cord, but not with silk.

There are other methods of securing a clasp to a string of beads, such as a crimp wire, or a cone, but the only one that is appropriate for pearls strung on silk thread is the French Wire method.

[jewel457]

Everyone uses their own methods... a given!

I joined this forum a few months ago and have never posted until today. It seems this is "often" a forum of putting down the various available methods, with most claiming their way is better than others.

Almost always.

French Wire is cheaper than 14k bead tip and clam shell is even more expensive. If one want to say bead tip / clam shell manner is the cheap way of making a necklace... that would be false.

Further more, I have yet to come across French Wire in 14k or SS. This wire is most often offered as plated base metal. Put that with a 14k or whatever precious metal and we are cheater our customers.

[jshepherd]

Cheaper? No. The professional standard, yes. That is just the way it is. Low-end goods come from Asia without french wire and with things such as the clam shell style finish. I know of no companies that deal in high-end merchandise that use anything other than the french wire. As a professional, anything else give the impression of a substandard product. And I am quite certain nearly all pearl sellers would agree with me.

[jshepherd]

With those types of pearls there would definitely be the exception. But how many pearl companies deal in strand of natural pearls? When talking classic, high-end, cultured pearl jewelry, it is always the french wire method. When beading or designing, anything goes.

[perlas]

Here's what I think.

It's funny how french wire has become an indicative of a high-end strand.

99.9% of the people still thinks that a blue box or a red box is indicative of a high-end strand. Some even still thinks that all pearls outside of these boxes are low-end. How else would they get away with sky-high prices?

They are just status quo.

Not so long ago and even now if you google the net, the mere mention of "freshwater pearls" is enough for majority of the people to assume "low-end pearls".

The quality of the pearls should be seen in themselves, not some fancy box, or fancy wire, or fancy clasp. Although yes, the boxes and the french wire do look professional and widely accepted as of YET, however, bead caps and clam shells are aesthetically pleasing as well.

French wire is available in Hongkong, so some booth vendors here uses french wire in low-end strands and even Mallorcas. Most though, string quality south sea and tahitian pearls without them. Heck, I even use french wire for my lowly beadworks.

I recently saw a fugly (conchiolin showing, some with tales, you know the works) akoya with a clasp in platinum and rose cut diamonds. The beauty of the clasp cannot hide the ugliness of the pearls. Vice versa, really nice pearls will show their beauty with or without the french wire, or the fancy box, or the fancy clasp, or even a fancy certificate.

[jerin]

Originally Posted by jshepherd

With those types of pearls there would definitely be the exception. But how many pearl companies deal in strand of natural pearls? When talking classic, high-end, cultured pearl jewelry, it is always the french wire method. When beading or designing, anything goes.

Jeremy and Stephen,

very nice part-explanations for us laymen in the business of stringing but I would appreciate an explicit explanation of the starting and ending of a CLASSIC pearl strand that goes like this...

Use a twisted wire needle....or what? Size?
Last pearl - (jump ring)tip bead or clamshell then french wire over the eylet that goes into the clasp etc.

Before starting the first pearl begin with......
Glue?
Cement?
Threading back throug the last two pearls or what?
And where do I get 14 KK French wire or the wire You do use?
As I want to do the restringing myself these are important questions.

Appreciate a complete answer to that all-important question.

Beside the silk what could be used in pearl strands?
In my own creations of pearls with crystals: what kind of thread would be strong enough and durable (Swarowski crystals) to work with? And I mean to knot between every pearl or bead.....