View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-07-2008, 05:16 PM
jshepherd's Avatar
jshepherd jshepherd is offline
Super Moderator
Senior Pearl-Guide.com Pearl Expert
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,622
Ward got it wrong. So did Matlins and a few others.

I believe a lot of his evidence and the evidence of a few others at the time, came from pearls with peeling nacre. If nacre peels or comes apart at a conchioline layer, it appears as though there is a pearl in a pearl.

Their theory of pearl-nucleated pearls was proven wrong by Tom Moses (and I believe Ken Scarratt) at the New York GIA lab a few years ago with the help of Honora pearl.
__________________
Jeremy Shepherd
President and Founder
PearlParadise.com, Inc.
The PearlParadise.com Channel
Reply With Quote