Quote:
Originally Posted by Pearl_dreams  I didn't realize you had other websites, Jeremy.
A lot of retailers had disappointing sales this holiday season, from what I've read. It was very generous of you to offer us the exotics in spite of it all. I love mine!
Now here is a question for you: I fully expect to get favorable comments when I am wearing the exotics. People will ask where they came from. Shall we just go ahead and say that the pearls came from PP (even though there aren't any of these on the public website?) What is the best way to handle that question? |
The part about combining Web sites was a slight misquote. One of the ways we are intending to streamline is through attrition and combining different Web site support positions into single positions - not combining Web sites. The "slashing prices 50% on unsold inventory" was wrong too. That is referring to the last minute sale 10 days before Christmas that offered five different styles, one of which was priced at half in order to clear it from inventory.
Overall the article was good. They almost always have some mistakes. At least these were minor; unlike the LA Business Journal article that was more than half wrong. I just wish all papers employed fact checkers like WSJ. That article was perfect. But every sentence was verified and checked for accuracy.
Regarding the exotics, I don't mind if you tell people where you got them. Just don't tell them to call us to get some for themselves
We have absolutely none left!